Some individuals hold the belief that witnessing a theatrical performance, musical concert, or sporting spectacle firsthand within the confines of a theater or stadium yields a more gratifying experience than observing it on a television screen. I wholeheartedly concur with this perspective due to the enhanced visual and emotional encounters that spectators can relish.
On the one hand, it is undeniably accurate that individuals valuing seclusion would deem television as the optimal choice for indulging in an entertaining program. The absence of disturbances or interruptions from others allows them to fully immerse themselves in the program. In certain instances, with a high-quality media system, the watching experience can be substantially amplified. Furthermore, excluding live broadcasts, viewers possess the ability to pause, rewind, or even magnify any scene of the program they are engrossed in. This affords a more convenient and flexible form of amusement compared to live events.
However, my inclination leans toward the notion that the interactions offered by live performances surpass those provided by television. Firstly, individuals have the opportunity to immerse themselves in the genuine and vivacious atmosphere that recorded shows fail to replicate. For instance, in a stadium setting, the excitement or even mirth is often intensified by the presence of a multitude. The sensory onslaught from the sounds, moments, and emotions of the crowd can evoke an indelible sentiment within viewers, which a television show might be unable to deliver. Secondly, attending an event grants individuals the chance to encounter their idols or cherished celebrities in person. In fact, some viewers are willing to expend a considerable sum of money or undertake extensive journeys to attend a show because they yearn to meet the individuals they adore or admire. If this endeavor proves fruitful, it can evoke positive emotions and serve as a wellspring of motivation for them.
In conclusion, while watching a program on television might be more private and convenient, I believe that attending a live spectacle will bring better and unique experiences.
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of 92
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58787878788 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17990707397 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5449809386 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.933333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157793146178 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454676544229 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410392789252 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100099350895 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282817806059 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.