Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and
poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it
must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is little room for doubt that the thriving of economies plays an essential role in tackling the problems related to hunger and poverty. It would be argued that economic growth is the only solution to those global issues. In my opinion, however, it is high time for an end of that kind of growth to conserve the environment.
On the one hand, those who see economic growth alone as the sole cure for the tragedy of world hunger
and poverty propose one major argument. Only the growth of the economies of the
developing countries will provide the poor with the wealth to afford the basic necessities
of life. The profits made by corporations who are responsible for this economic growth
will trickle down in the form of financial benefits to be enjoyed by the starving and
needy. This view has justified the age of imperialism and the destruction of the
livelihood of millions in the name of progress.
On the other hand, there are countless examples to support the opposing view that
economic growth results in environmental destruction. Firstly, this is true for developing
countries, where lowland rainforests have been cleared and unsustainable agricultural
practices introduced to produce cash crops, often for export. Secondly, it is also true for
developed economies. For example, the continued use of fossil fuels, which provide the
energy for growing industrialisation, is causing global warming. This is leading to a rise
in sea levels, which will eventually make tens of millions of poor people in Bangladesh
homeless.
In conclusion, economic growth which is not sustainable must be stopped. If it is not
based on meeting human needs rather than generating profits, such growth will only
create more poverty and lead to more hunger in the world by destroying natural
resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | hplong93 | 61 | view |
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject.What are causes? And what will be effects on society? 78
- Some people think that children should start school at a very early age, but others believe that they should not go to school until they are older, Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Children who are brought up in the family that do not have a lot of money are better prepared to deal with problems when they become adults than children who are brought up by wealthy parent. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... the poor with the wealth to afford the basic necessities of life. The profits made by corporati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17905405405 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84405488557 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.940365186 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.38176352705 411% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221855241069 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843491056006 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075493891611 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651380669218 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685933612558 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.