Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is some dispute whether development of economy is helping people who are hungry and poor or is destroying the natural environment. Both viewpoints have their own advantages and disadvantages which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, it is obvious that economic development is making great contribution to society by creating more jobs, launching social campaigns or donating money to the less advantaged individuals. Given the constant expansion of different economic sectors, demand for labor capital increases accordingly. This means that people may find it easier to land a job, by which, these people are able to make their living and trip off poverty. An additional merit of developing economy is that the rich, who are beneficial from flourishment of economy, after achieving their financial indepence would plough back their money in order to help imporverished individuals through either social programmes or sponsoring money for the poor people. By doing so, the rich not only shows their social responsibility but also benefits their community. Finally, if economic development is maintained for a long period, there will be more taxes contributing to national fund, which in turn can be used to invest in provision of capital or materials for the disadvantaged in order to striping off poverty, thereby living better off. Therefore, it is beneficial for all social members when their nation succeeds financially.
On the other hand, posperity of an economy exerts a burden on the ecosystem.
First, overexploitation of natural resources to feed the upsurge in demand of an increasing number of rich people could place the enviroment at risk. The manufacture process of the elements narrow habitat of flora and fauna, which are essential to keep the balance of the biodiversity. In addition, industrialization is the main culprit of pollution to natural world. First, the movement leaves enormous amount of carbon footbprint such as waste, emission which are dangerous to the nature. If the by-products are not managed well, they can cause detrimental impacts on land, water bodies and air. Thus, affects on natural world could be attributed directly to the increase in economic activities of human.
In sum, even though effects on the environment is unavoidable, the benefits of developed economy are enormous for those who are less well-off. I agree with the view that prosperity brings more goods than harms to our world.
- These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing Is this affecting individuals and the environment in positive or a negative way Give reasons for your answer and support by giving examples 89
- In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crimes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3059125964 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98209156864 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596401028278 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5072263144 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981130705697 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299668806596 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252861496422 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510231147747 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189779590626 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.