Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that economic growth is the best way to eliminate hunger and poverty, while others contend that such growth is detrimental to nature and must be curtailed. Although such development causes damage to different natural parts of the earth, it is the most effective way to address poverty and hunger.
the opponents of economic growth often point to the fact that the integrity of nature is impacted. Such idea is predicated on certain observations in developing countries where the quality of soil and water has been deteriorated by economic activities such as the construction of new buildings, ultimately affecting the well-being of nature. For example, the development of new residential areas often necessitates the construction of extensive road infrastructure which requires the clearance of different floral species, hence the loss of other species reliant on them. Conversely, the environment in developed countries is often clean and exhibit less significant damages than developing ones due to stricter environmental regulations on economic activities.
Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, we cannot afford to stop the economic growth as it remains the most feasible means of alleviating poverty and hunger. Developing countries often attract foreign investments into rural areas where poverty is prevalent in order to establish new industries and businesses, subsequently generating more jobs and augmenting the average living standards. In fact, similar strategies were adopted in formerly impoverished countries such as South Korea and China where the environment used to be significantly deteriorated. Therefore, improvements in living standards could not have been achieved without extensive economic activities. However, allowing such activities to be done without stringent environmental laws will lead to irreplaceable damage to the local environment. As a result, it is imperative for the government to minimize the impact of economic progress by, for example, imposing heavy fines on unfriendly environmental projects and inviting environmentalists to monitor and assess economic plans to ensure that the local environment will be least affected.
In conclusion, although there is some environmental damage accrued from economic activity, it is vital to introduce laws and other strategies to decrease the impact as much as possible rather than to abandon economic growth.
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 90
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- only the government action can solve housing shortages in big cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think thay the tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and other consumer goods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than performers of classic music Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e way to address poverty and hunger. the opponents of economic growth often poin...
^^^
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ess significant damages than developing ones due to stricter environmental regulatio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g standards could not have been achieved without extensive economic activities. H...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78651685393 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24351002436 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0941099097 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.461538462 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270641454386 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102489513648 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808383043391 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187504896734 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589617906443 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.