Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is often argued that the reduction of starvation and deprivation would happen through the growth of the economy. Whereas others believe that it would be detrimental to the atmosphere and that must be stopped. However, in my opinion, financial growth is inevitable for the country's overall development and environmental consequences also can be tackled with wise management and money.
Monetary development is the cornerstone of the sustainability of every nation. This could help to identify and treat poor people's enhancement to the core. The government can able to support them with insurance, loan, food, education, and other necessary supplies through the national scheme from the growing economy. For instance, district hospitals and government schools are providing free food and treatment for those who have an included card or evidence of low-income level. Furthermore, the declining financial stability of a country leads to the citizen's livelihood and day-to-day life to a long extent. People may intend to do crimes and other criminal activities to meet their living standards or to fulfill their hunger and their family's needs. For example, a poor economy may lead to inflation and an excessive cost of living at the core.
On the other hand, people who think economic development brings more catastrophic effects on the global surroundings by waste, pollution, and climate changes. Initially, industrialization , modernization and technological advancements are the major advantage of the economic growth. As a result excessive disposal of industrial, and household waste brings environmental hazards. Secondly, these development increase the usage of vehicles, machineries, and other instrumental usages which may lead to pollution, global warming and other consequences. Economically stabled country may increase the usage of disposable items and use and throw policy also brings environmental hazards. Nevertheless, government and higher authority can minimize this issue through the proper legislation and low. Similarly, environmental pollution can be reduce with waste management, proper disposal of waste and recycling procedure if the nation have enough money and materials.
In conclusion, there are many opinions in terms of economic surge and environmental problems. While in my opinion, sustained development in thrift would be essential for each country to omit poverty and hunger. Likewise, escalating thrift would be more than enough to control environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ial stability of a country leads to the citizens livelihood and day-to-day life to a lon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...te changes. Initially, industrialization , modernization and technological advance...
^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
...brings environmental hazards. Secondly, these development increase the usage of vehicles, machine...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs environmental hazards. Nevertheless, government and higher authority can mini...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76010781671 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17340389069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574123989218 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0763152497 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161827316023 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483510260736 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458311139381 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10560307603 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041104506787 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.