Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Disputes around economic growth continue to be controversial. Most people consider that economic growth is an exclusive method to break up starvation and misery, whereas an alternative opinion is that economic development causes harm to the environment and should be stunted. There are strong views on both sides, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, supporters of the economic development believe that it leads to an increase of population incomes and provides people the basic necessity of life. For example, developed countries worldwide can provide their citizens with different ways of livelyhood because of variety of industry. As a result people seek to earn more money by working hard at different types of institutes. The total profit gained from all manufacturers is liable for trickling down, as a result employees can get the allowance to their salaries.
On the other hand, the opponents of the industrialization say that the pollution outweigh all benefits of improved livelyhood. If industry continues to damage environment no poverty or starvation will be caused of planet disasters. For instance, ozone hole which cannot be solved by economic growth. Furthermore, the flood due to warming causes a loss more than poverty.
In conclusion, my own feelings are that both opinions are right and people should reach consensus because mankind can resist hunger and misery by supporting environment and developing new eco-friendly manufacturing. Moreover, we witness how many developed countries, which have advanced economy, are concerning about pollution. Of course, they can afford to use high-tech production because they could come out the troubles with poverty and now are able to pay their attention on environment.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elyhood because of variety of industry. As a result people seek to earn more money...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...countries, which have advanced economy, are concerning about pollution. Of course, they can af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43956043956 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00673924487 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0655538176 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251041324493 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743855104597 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637223466709 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139362010531 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745027941995 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.