Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extant do you agree or disagree?
Some think it is better to build new houses in the open spaces. While others back the option of planting trees and consider it as crucial. I totally agree with the latter opinion, because of the trees important effects on locals' lives.
On one hand, some prefer to have more houses in the cities to answer the need for housing. That is because the population in towns increase steadily, while the supply of housing options does not grow at the same pace. Thus, there is a gap in the market of housing between demand and supply in many cities around the world; hence, the prices of houses and apartments are spiking. Therefore, those people encourage the use of open spaces as additional housing zones to close the market gap. For example, Cairo is the home for more than fifteen million citizens and suffers from an extensive housing problem. Therefore, the city's officials changed many internal open areas and gardens into residential projects. However, I believe this is not the right way to approach the housing demand issue, as it creates crowded towns with a low level of sustainability.
On the other hand, planting trees in open spaces has numerous benefits. Firstly, trees enhance the air quality in the city, which in return, decrease the level of air pollution resulted from some house and industrial practices. That is an overall boost for the environment. Second benefit is creating open zones for the residents to enjoy recreational activities, such as parks and gardens. Consequently, the residents' standard of living is elevated significantly. In my opinion, living in a healthy and well-functioning city has a great positive impact on both; individuals' and societies.
To conclude, although some favour building new houses in open spaces to supply new homes, I agree with the view of planting trees in those areas. That is because I believe that the locals' health level is far more important than creating short term poorly planned housing solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-31 | nigora@ | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | jashan2407 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | jashan2407 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | jashan2407 | 73 | view |
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 79
- Many people prefer to spend money and to not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 73
- The use of smartphones is decreasing our collective intelligence because we are reliant on the technology not on our own minds To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locals'' or 'local's'?
Suggestion: locals'; local's
...eas. That is because I believe that the locals health level is far more important than...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64341751471 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8394899285 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350746179941 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971841369692 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643587284895 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215393389556 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593235769146 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.