Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings others however think it is cruel and unnecessary Discuss both views and give your opinion

Planet earth is a gift by mother nature for human beings, with all the creatures and ecosystems that aid the development of societies. All the organisms known and unknown contribute to the balance found in the environment today. Despite the fact that people are completely dependent on the ecosystem, a minor group claims it is acceptable to disrupt the balance for greed and personal wants.

It is an undeniable fact that populations thrive on the availability of necessary prerequisites like; shelter and food. These requirements are provided by other organisms that share the planet with humans. Being nearly impossible to replace such contributions with scientific researches, humans have always found ways to protect their environment from others greed.

On the other hand, a small group of people assert that it is logical to aim for humans benefits as a first priority, ignoring all other aspects as they are insignificant. Adding to that, they claim that it is only logical to test medicine on animals to observe its effectiveness. However, this is void of any plausible reasons. To illustrate, these animals that they regard as lab experiments take a critical role in maintaining the environment by balancing the crucial life cycles and other sophisticated processes.

All in all, it is believed that ecosystems form a main factor in maintaining the human race however some humans still speculate its importance and aim for their early doom. In my opinion, I agree withe the former stance as although human being have custody on earth, they must respect other animals and neglect their greed before mother nature kicks us all out.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'claim'?
Suggestion: claim
...pendent on the ecosystem, a minor group claims it is acceptable to disrupt the balance...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s still speculate its importance and aim for their early doom. In my opinion, I a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17602996255 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86030038562 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3810634571 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213858568531 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696753082697 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468028669499 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123388081216 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362688898597 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.