Animals have been used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medication and check the safety of products destined for human use for ages. While I tend toward the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation before the medicines are cleared for human use.
Proponents of the use of animals in medical research believe that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments. They argue that people receiving medical treatments that had been developed through the use of animal testing would feel grateful rather than offended. In addition, animal testing is crucial to ensure whether the vaccines are safe. Take the Covid-19 pandemic as an example, scientists racing to develop a vaccine for coronavirus need to test extensively on genetically modified mice to prevent "vaccine enhancement", a situation that makes the disease worse in some people. Also, there is almost no adequate alternative to testing on a living and whole-body system, which is extremely complex.
On the other hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. It is accused of cruelty and inhumanity because animals used in experiments would be commonly subjected to force-feeding, food and water deprivation, and the infliction of wounds and pains. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new product could be measured. Opponents of such research believe that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and the lives of all creatures should be respected. Nowadays it is such a trend that cruelty-free products are becoming the women's preferred choice. Many countries have banned or restricted the sale of cosmetics with ingredients tested on animals, including nations in the European Union.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to completely ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed. Though animal testing on new drugs and medical procedures is a necessary evil, I personally agreed with the banning of this method for mon-medical products.
- Topic Fossil Fuels such as coal oil and natural gas is extensively in many countries which cause harm to the environment The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is being encouraged in many countries Is this a positive or ne 89
- Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings others however think it is cruel and unnecessary Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Topic Fossil Fuels such as coal oil and natural gas is extensively in many countries which cause harm to the environment The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is being encouraged in many countries Is this a positive or ne 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36752136752 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03790016759 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8103829566 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259045211672 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865547609807 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535828851723 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168069374099 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503811414514 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.