Some people say learning history is a waste of time, others believe it has a role to play in society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been an ongoing debate over the question of whether history practically offers a benefit to society. Although some people claim it does have a practical advantage to society, others argue it is unnecessary. I believe that history has a role to play in helping human realizes the mistakes that happened in the past and is vital for those who work in particular professions.
On the one hand, critics who argue that history offers nothing for society today often point out its purposeless in today’s job market. They claim that there are no requirements of having prior knowledge of history in almost every occupation. The examples are professions such as accountants, chefs, retail employees, or those who work on construction sites, and these people are able to proceed with daily tasks at work without having to learn what happened in the events.
On the other hand, others hold a strong opinion that favours the essence of historical knowledge. It is a testament to acknowledging past errors and preventing the same possible future mistakes. History teaches us that catastrophes and atrocities in the olden days, such as wars, should not be repeated. Hence, by teaching the millennial and younger generations about this past behaviour and incidents, we will stand a chance in avoiding history repeating itself. To elucidate, in the past, millions of black people were subjected to slavery, and we now know that this way of human treatment is inhumane and immoral.
In my opinion, I uphold the idea of educating the young about past events because it would be illogical to say that we didn’t learn from human errors made by us. I believe it provides plenty of practical benefits as some professions require an in-depth knowledge of historical events. They are teachers and professors at university as well as scientists who work in the field of archaeology or social science.
In conclusion, Although some oppose the idea of learning from past mistakes as it seems to have no practical benefits to society, I firmly believe that history has a role to play in our society as it acts as a testament to prevent the same mistakes in the future and is helpful for those who work in certain areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | chinh11111 | 73 | view |
- In most of the societies the role of mother and father differs What are the causes of this difference What will be the parental roles in future 61
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
- The most common solution for criminal behaviour is a prison but many believe education is a better method To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some feel executives in large companies shoud receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
There has been an ongoing debate over the question of whether history practically offers a benefit to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97580645161 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76048307255 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6849382307 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20458046604 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631575010985 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469629613526 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117025606234 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371530939738 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.