In recent years, more and more ecological problems started facing humans. As the dispute over this case grew greater, many people claim that the extinction of certain animal and plant kingdoms is the prime issue, while others believe that there are far more crucial ones than this. This essay will thoroughly explain both views and tell why we should be focusing on other hazardous complications.
The current scenario of environmental issues includes plenty of problems to be mentioned such as global warming, drought, greenhouse emissions and more. However, this list of problems caused humans to confuse and freak out about which requires urgent solutions most. The only relaxing aspect of it is that as long as these catastrophic complications are still under our control, their effects can be as well or even prevented on the long run. This is simply why a wiser decision is to focus on what's presently between our hands and tackle it before it turns to a mess.
Unlike present environmental problems, extinction is more of an uncontrollable issue since it is irreversible. It is true that its effects are indeed threatening, but they're immediate and not long lasting. To explain in other words, the loss of a certain kind of organisms in the past was clearly very effective and harmful on the food chain causing imbalance, but the development of living things, races and creatures repaired the delicate food web through inventing new ones of different factors. That's what leads us to a very logical convection that we can more aware of the effects of extinction at the same time of solving more menacing issues.
Summing things up, between lots of ecological complications, extinction has threatening impact as it's irreversible. The global solution must be to concentrate on more urgent issues that indeed need sustainable approaches before turning into disasters.
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- Some people say that adertising is extremely successful at pursuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss bothe these views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ply why a wiser decision is to focus on whats presently between our hands and tackle ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...its effects are indeed threatening, but theyre immediate and not long lasting. To expl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...nventing new ones of different factors. Thats what leads us to a very logical convect...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proaches before turning into disasters.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, well, while, kind of, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15081967213 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82800142241 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629508196721 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5983722149 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171723888641 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557417289291 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406265508369 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926122423534 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510294931466 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.