Some people say that marriages should be arranged by intermediaries Others say that young people should be free to choose their marriage partners Which viewpoint do you agree with

Getting marriaged is undoubtedly a turning point in each individual life. However, that selecting future spouse based on third-party arrangement or self-determination is controversial. In the modern society, I am firmly in favour of the latter perspective.
First and foremost, making decision is a fundamental right of a human-being that nobody could neither refuse nor intervene. Playing as an indication of freedom of choice, marry for love contributedly ensures the adoption of human rights in the contemporary world. In some ancient civilizations such as China or India, marry by choice would be totally sacrificed for the reinforcement of the arranged couple’s families relationship, regardless of whether affection existed between them or not. If the couple’s later endeavour to seek mutual voice was in vain, their following days of life would probably be the apocalypse. Therefore, freedom of marriage is an appropriate opinion in the modern times to help people escape from this out-dated feudal thinking that has been remaining for centuries.
More importantly, a love-based matrimony will help each individual achieve the sense of well-being. Being exhausted after a long day of stressful work, enjoying the rest of the day with the loving partner will simultaneously help release negative energy and regenerate motivation and excitement for the next working day. Furthermore, thanks to the comprehension of partner’s characteristic in a consensual relationship, it appears likely that the probability of divorce is lower than that of an arranged couple. As a result, this leads to a permanent and fulfilling conjugal life.
To encapsulate, a marriage should be the result of the freedom of choice to promote the implementation of human rights and cultivate the sense of fulfillment. A world full of emotional satisfaction is better than an artificial one.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, third, well, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52777777778 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37165472069 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3873026256 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160586577313 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449512809328 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438402169922 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891808190207 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314244926054 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.