Some people say that marriages should be arranged by intermediaries. Others say that young people should be free to choose their marriage partners.
Which viewpoint do you agree with ?
Over the past, marriage has been one of the most vital institutions in human society. The issue of debate is whether spouses are paired together hinged on pure romantic love or arrangement. In my opinion, love-based marriages would bring a multitude of benefits to both partners.
To begin with, getting married based on personal choice would help both spouses to keep their marriage longer and healthier. Couples who have already known and understood each other could contemplate their compatibility, financial condition, or religion before getting married which makes them less likely to conflict. Because of comprehending thoroughly each other, it is easier for them to confide and share their own difficulties in order to overcome those together. To be more specific, a national lockdown was imposed by many countries so as a consequence, couples are mostly staying at home together now. Sharing and caring are more and more important to maintain the happiness and sustainability of their relationship.
Furthermore, choice motivates oneself to work on marriage as a commitment. The purpose of establishing a marital relationship with a loved one is despite having some tough times, togetherness could be maintained forever. Therefore, decisions made by oneself ensure responsibility for building a life together through ups and downs times. If it weren’t a love-based marriage, both spouses would not sacrifice for the sake of the two which could lead to conflict and divorce.
To sum up, getting married should be based on actual love and personal choice to keep marriage long-lasting and fulfilling. In the modern world, the right to choose is a fundamental right of humans. To accommodate people with that, this kind of marriage is justified and should be encouraged.
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that education for people to eat less junk food could tackle this problem Others claim that education will not work Discuss both these views and give you 78
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive affects Others say it causes the loss of national identities 67
- In some developed countries people become fat because they eat too much junk food Suggest some ways that governments and food companies can encourage people to stay fit and eat a healthy diet 78
- To what extent does the Internet increase social cohesion 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34519572954 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03057455994 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5693240698 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213115113557 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688765575787 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725328795577 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13038484773 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822111803654 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.