Nowadays, with the advancement of technology, mobile phones play a crucial role in daily activities of an individual. However, some people claims that it should be banned in public and crowded places due to the fact that people who use mobile phones pay less attention to surrounding things and accident are inevitable. I disagree with this idea.
To begin with, communication through a long distance becomes easier with the advancement of mobile phones. In addition, almost mobile devices in the present day have an ability to access the Internet, which helps the citizen proactive in the updating news, receiving and sending messages. Furthermore, when coming to a new area or a new country, travellers are effortless to navigate themselves to a desired destination by using a map application on mobile devices. More simple method of payment is also introduced in recent years, which encourage an individual to bring only their smartphone when going outside.
On the other hand, the vast majority of people are relying too much on a smartphone, in long run, they addicted to it. As a result, they have less time to do outdoor activities and get accustomed to a sedentary lifestyle. Furthermore, concentrated on their smartphone too much while walking is very dangerous and may cause an accident. In my opinion, the government should raise the citizen’s awareness about the drawbacks of using mobile devices in public places. They may promote a campaign to encourage people to spend less time on mobile devices. Meanwhile, instead of prohibiting the mobile users in public places, encourage them to turn their phone to silent mode would be enough.
In conclusion, in my opinion, it is undeniable that mobile phones do bring some drawback. However, due to the indispensable for part of life of mobile devices, they should not be banned in any place.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11842105263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89419103706 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.241510911 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269104457367 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855789584372 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084750840329 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184019042721 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972907126605 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.