There is increasing concern over the substantial rise in the number of private vehicles. Although owning a car brings many benefits such as comfortable and flexible in moving, it affects adversely to our health and the environment. Thus, some people claim that the petrol tax should be imposed heavier to mitigate traffic and the amount of exhaust emission to the environment. I partly agree with this proposition.
On the one hand, traffic in populated cities causes many problems. In particular, while traffic congestion affects negatively to an individual habit, the polluted air damages both people’s health and the environment. For example, being stuck in a heavy traffic in rush hours not only make an individual unhappy and tired but also affect directly to their work-life balance. Moreover, absorbed fossil fuels also cause numerous serious diseases such as respiratory disease and lung cancer. Thus, the government should take some actions to tackle these problems. Increasing the tax on petrol may help, the expensive of vehicle’s fuels helps one think twice before making the final decision, thus the number of private cars may witness a significant decline.
On the other hand, besides reducing the number of private vehicles, the authorities also need to encourage their residents to use public transports. However, the current public transports may be uncomfortable and unreliable. In fact, the metro systems are often dirty and crowded due to the minority of low awareness people. Furthermore, in rush hours, because of the traffic jam, the train is slow and not always arrive on time. Hence, the tax which is imposed can then be allocated to establishing more reliable and user friendly public transports.
In conclusion, to protect our own health as well as the environment, I personally believe that in addition to increasing the tax on petrol, the government should also spend more money on building a convenient and comfortable public transport infrastructure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'heavy traffic'.
Suggestion: heavy traffic
...nvironment. For example, being stuck in a heavy traffic in rush hours not only make an individu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35987261146 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92903787111 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1104024062 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200161751872 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627777129521 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691108551379 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126619005263 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670986955103 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.