Nowadays, thanks to the rapid and sudden advancement of technology, many customers can purchase goods through a vast swath of media platforms while working or studying. However, some spenders still complaining about the disadvantages of this shopping type. This essay will illuminate the two options.
For starters, it is obvious that technology helps the shopping operations usher in an utterly prominent period. According to this opinion, customers these days are exposed to an enormous amount of advertising contents from various trading organizations that have lots of positive impacts on the clients. These positive influencers might be the higher choice of suitable commodities only by some simple movement on the screen of their smart-phones or computers. Furthermore, especially in the severe condition of spreading outbreak of Covid-19 epidemic, distance shopping operations are demanded in every corner of the world.
On the other hand, others believe that the disadvantages of online shopping outweigh the advantages. Firstly, virtual bargain activities can be unreliable because the retailers cannot face-to-face introduce their clients about the products and equally, customers also do not have any ability to observe or check the products’ materials before purchasing, thus, they can be negatively deceived or unsatisfied. Secondly, people also concern about their personal database’s security of which they posted on some online shopping platforms. Undeniably, these social platforms are lacking cement safeguard for the users’ personal information.
In conclusion, the two opposite opinions are both reasonable. Personally, I do not oppose the brilliant benefits of modern technology in trading operations, nevertheless, I do believe more in the advantages of traditional shopping manner.
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects person who is being accused of the crime some lawyears have suggested that this practise should be changed an
- The charts below give information about world s spending world s population and consumption of resources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90494296578 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08489470557 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653992395437 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.906065483 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153438647511 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533292824589 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429421966938 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877060580879 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281125620875 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.