Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion

Nowadays, thanks to the rapid and sudden advancement of technology, many customers can purchase goods through a vast swath of media platforms while working or studying. However, some spenders still complaining about the disadvantages of this shopping type. This essay will illuminate the two options.
For starters, it is obvious that technology helps the shopping operations usher in an utterly prominent period. According to this opinion, customers these days are exposed to an enormous amount of advertising contents from various trading organizations that have lots of positive impacts on the clients. These positive influencers might be the higher choice of suitable commodities only by some simple movement on the screen of their smart-phones or computers. Furthermore, especially in the severe condition of spreading outbreak of Covid-19 epidemic, distance shopping operations are demanded in every corner of the world.
On the other hand, others believe that the disadvantages of online shopping outweigh the advantages. Firstly, virtual bargain activities can be unreliable because the retailers cannot face-to-face introduce their clients about the products and equally, customers also do not have any ability to observe or check the products’ materials before purchasing, thus, they can be negatively deceived or unsatisfied. Secondly, people also concern about their personal database’s security of which they posted on some online shopping platforms. Undeniably, these social platforms are lacking cement safeguard for the users’ personal information.
In conclusion, online shopping, nowadays, is thought to be ubiquitous. Although some people suppose that shopping with the help of technology has become easier, others disagree and say that it only brings disadvantages. Personally, I do believe more in the advantages of traditional shopping manner.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87545787546 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03793986341 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7380240852 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181505787474 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606986078215 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793741870501 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11175397365 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693890950636 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.