A number of people recently argue that shopping nowadays has become easier thanks to modern technology whereas others have opposite opinions about it. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the former view for the following reasons.
There are several causes why modern technology brings some drawbacks to our lives. Many consumers may buy items that are low-quality to use. It is obvious that we cannot see the products we want to buy by our directly naked-eyes so that the material quality or the exact size of products seems unclear for us. Due to this, customers can be cheated to purchase fake items from online stores and they cannot refund it back. In Viet Nam, many consumers have complained about the products they have purchased online and when the items are delivered to them, they have realized that the material, as well as the size of the products, do not match with the information that the store has written in the description.
Despite its negative impacts, modern technology still bring to us a lot of significant benefits. For one, consumers will have a range of selections for plenty of items to purchase. They can stay at home to relax and surf the internet to decide what they will spend money on, compared to shopping in-store which you have to visit stores to make your purchase decision. Furthermore, shopping online platforms also help us to protect our health, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. When you come to a store, you will have to face a lot of people and you have to wait for a long line to check out which is not only a waste of time but also bring your health to the brink of risk.
To sum up, although modern technology may bring some weaknesses to our shopping activity, the strengths of shopping online still outweigh the disadvantages. Nevertheless, customers still need to raise the awareness of shopping depending on technology so that they can have a great choice of purchasing goods that they desire to have.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82890855457 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59151552145 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551622418879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2908775721 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144894299209 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576912557609 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694642949691 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113792775002 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687936111411 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.