Many people believe that there are far better ways to purchase the money that is allocated to space exploration. From my perspective, I totally agree with this statement for the following reasons.
Apparently, not all countries have space exploration programs. Only countries with massive economies, such as the United States and China can afford to support such projects. Nevertheless, the amount of money spent on these initiatives is tremendous and it may be better spent on other purposes such as environmental concerns. It is undeniable that humans are contaminating the world and destroying the ecosystem at an alarming rate which appears to be little serious action being taken to prevent a global environmental catastrophe in the foreseeable future. The billions of money purchased on space exploration each year might be utilized to finance environmental restoration efforts so that future generations may live on a healthy and safe Earth.
Furthermore, purchasing billions of dollars on space exploration programs appears ridiculous when millions of people across the world struggle without enough food to eat each day or a suitable place to live. Instead, these billions of dollars could make a huge difference in the lives of millions of people around the world by funding programs to help educate, feed, and house the world's poor, impoverished, and sick people, which would be far more meaningful than any advantages generated from exploring space. We could spend billions of dollars and many years going into space and achieve nothing, but the same amount of money could facilitate the lives of millions of individuals in the same duration of time.
To conclude, I suppose that whereas space exploration may have some strengths, funding for space exploration should be kept to a bare minimum until environmental and poverty issues on the planet are fully addressed.
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where relevant 78
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays children spend more time playing computer games than doing sports Why is it happening Does it have a positive or negative effect on their development 42
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, i suppose, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34563758389 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94605837404 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1931062347 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19489011809 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786379706361 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466543609579 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129287368355 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394633166482 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.