It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development

The population is estimated to have a higher percentage of elderly than that of youngsters in various regions in the foreseeable years. From my observation, this projection is definitely an unbeneficial amelioration for the following reasons.

On the one hand, there are several causes to elucidate why a number of people assume that this is a positive improvement. Apparently, the old population is one of the birth-control that prevent individuals from the proliferation of citizens which leads to the overpopulation issue. Additionally, having old residents will bring a healthy lifestyle as well as an educational environment to people owing to their accumulation of experiences in the past when wars and conflicts were still happening. Consequently, the elderly have a wide range of knowledge related to their acquirements to develop the country to be a better one and help juveniles to broaden their horizon of life experiences.

On the other hand, notwithstanding the benefits of the old population, the drawback sides are still more outstanding. Undeniably, having a number of old citizens will lead to the decline of young human resources. Youngsters are the bright future of regions and they will make a decision whether nations can be ameliorated or not. The youth have a massive amount of creativity as well as strength which are the major factor to innovate a country. On account of that, juveniles play an indispensable role in the nation’s development. Furthermore, due to the decrease of adolescents, numerous regions will have old longevity and lack of teenagers. Thus, many regions will not have the ability to renovate their economy to aid the citizens to establish greater living standards for them.

To conclude, albeit with various perks, having a high proportion of elderly is still a negative development as adolescents have a crucial part in individuals’ daily lives in specific and each country’s upturn in general.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ns can be ameliorated or not. The youth have a massive amount of creativity as well ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, furthermore, if, so, still, thus, well, in general, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33980582524 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27499136452 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9412246666 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163360259339 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482201209833 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397436026656 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875649043324 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264764068788 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.