Some people say that in the modern world, getting old is entirely bad. Others believe that old people’s life nowadays is much better than in the past. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary age, opinions diverge concerning the experience of aging. While some contend that growing old in the modern era is overwhelmingly negative, others argue that the lives of the elderly today have significantly improved compared to the past. This essay aims to explore both perspectives, giving weight to the notion that aging in the present world brings about significant challenges.
Those who advocate for the view that aging is intrinsically unfavorable often emphasize the myriad challenges associated with growing old in the modern world. They highlight health concerns, financial uncertainties, and the risk of social isolation that can cast a shadow over the latter years of life. Furthermore, the rapid pace of technological advancements, although advantageous in many ways, might inadvertently exacerbate the generation gap, making it an uphill battle for the elderly to keep pace with the swiftly evolving landscape.
Conversely, proponents of the notion that life for the elderly has experienced substantial improvement in contemporary times put forth several compelling arguments. Enhanced healthcare and advanced medical interventions have extended life expectancy and elevated the overall quality of life for seniors. The advent of the internet has revolutionized connectivity, enabling them to stay informed, maintain social ties, and engage in a wider range of activities. Additionally, the shifting societal attitudes reflect a more inclusive and respectful outlook toward seniors, acknowledging the invaluable wealth of their wisdom and experience.
From my standpoint, the former perspective holds greater validity. While modern advancements indeed bring benefits, they concurrently usher in their own set of challenges. The intricacies of modern life can undoubtedly pose formidable obstacles for the elderly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | Panda111 | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90671641791 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25840713942 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.638144536 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149117442055 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455804701485 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453014189568 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844175771036 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464030995507 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.