Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some advocates claim that one of the nice methods to make people from different background and generations gather together is music. I completely agree with this statement because of the following reasons.

First of all, it is undeniable that the melody of music can significantly impact people’s emotion and bring people who have the same feelings to get together. In other words, no matter how many differences between each others, the affections of human are similar. Therefore, those are frequently used in some special occasions in order to influence the guests. For example, the happiness songs are widely utilized to play on the wedding party. It is helpful to establish the joy and atmospheres, then the attended visitors are easier to get alone well in the event.

In addition to, the lyric also plays an important part of the reasons in this topic. The emotions of people are not only resonated with melody, but also with the meaning of the song. A nice lyric could clearly describe a situation, which is relevant to the person. In this case, even though some people are in the complex and miserable situation, others could increase the opportunities to understand through the lyrics without explanation. Accordingly, it could destroy the background barrier and bring the people who are suffering from the same situation together. For instance, a young girl who was cheated by her boyfriend might be sympathized with an old lady, getting divorced due to the same song what they listened.

In conclusion, I believe that the music is a good way to make people get closer and gain the chance for understanding and tolerance from each others with various backgrounds.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07913669065 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77694114114 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0090367343 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281621932554 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840365176853 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672519155608 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171431882108 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291424313091 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.