The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The access routes to a hospital in 2007 and 2010 are shown in the upper and lower maps respectively.

It is clear that the ring road surrounding the hospital itself was largely unchanged between 2007 and 2010. However, the transport infrastructure was considerably upgraded, most notably with the addition of two roundabouts, and the expansion of the car parking and bus facilities.

With regard to the ring road, the only change seen in 2010, compared to 2007, was the construction of a roundabout in the center of the southern section, in place of the original T-junction with Hospital Road. At the other end of the same road, a further roundabout was built at the location of the crossroads with City Road.

In 2007, the hospital was served by six bus stops on Hospital Road, with three on each side. By 2010, these stops had disappeared and had been replaced by a bus station to the west of Hospital Road, with access to both roundabouts mentioned above.

In 2007, there was only one car park, which stretched the full length of the east side of Hospital Road, with a single access point in the south-east of the ring road. By 2010, this had become a car park for staff only and a further car park for public use only had been constructed, to the right of the eastern section of the ring road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65517241379 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59857673932 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491379310345 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1510966139 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211749916996 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113481722244 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547432263964 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144305323842 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420829532949 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.