Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Music is a universal language that has the power to bring people from different cultures and ages together. While some may argue that music can also divide people based on personal taste and preferences, I strongly believe that its positive effects far outweigh the negative. In this essay, I will discuss the various ways in which music brings people together and the reasons why I agree that it is a powerful tool for promoting unity and understanding.
First and foremost, music has the ability to evoke emotions and feelings that are common to all human beings, regardless of cultural background. For example, a sad song can evoke feelings of empathy and compassion, while a happy song can evoke feelings of joy and excitement. This emotional connection that music creates is a powerful way of bridging cultural divides and uniting people from different backgrounds.
Another way in which music brings people together is through shared experiences and events. For example, music festivals and concerts provide a platform for people from different backgrounds to come together and enjoy a common experience. At such events, people are able to connect with others who share their musical preferences, and often form lasting relationships and memories. Furthermore, these events provide a space for people to escape from their daily lives and experience new cultures, further promoting unity and understanding.
In addition, music has the power to break down language barriers and promote intercultural communication. For example, a song in a foreign language can still be appreciated for its melody and rhythm, even if the lyrics are not understood. This appreciation of music across linguistic boundaries is a powerful way of promoting cross-cultural understanding and bringing people together.
Finally, music has the ability to inspire and bring people together in times of need. For example, during times of conflict or disaster, songs and music can provide a sense of comfort and hope, and help to unify people in their efforts to overcome challenges. Similarly, music can be used to raise awareness about important social and political issues, and bring people together in support of a common cause.
In conclusion, music is a powerful tool for bringing people of different cultures and ages together. Whether through its ability to evoke emotions, provide shared experiences, break down language barriers, or inspire people in times of need, music has the ability to unite people in ways that go beyond cultural and linguistic boundaries. For these reasons, I strongly agree that music is a good way of bringing people together and promoting unity and understanding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-30 | iZHTZH | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | Dida18 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | khangpro3107 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | khangpro3107 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | khangpro3107 | 73 | view |
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8814010433 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458823529412 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6247793677 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.842105263 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3812864741 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15826618284 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102580249426 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237323386573 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992179071529 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.