Physical education became a controversial part in many schools, debating about its importance as well as its harsh outcomes on the academics of a student. One group of members believes physical education such as yoga, exercise and sports not only benefit children in improving their health but also helps in concentration and provides maturity to decide the field they are interested in. On the other hand many oppose it as a mendaciousness and a great excuse to get break from academics and results in poor grades and fewer knowledge of the curriculum.
I believe including physical education to children benefits them in securing their health at tender ages. Many children nowadays suffer from obesity, digestive problems and other serious illness even in their ten's. Many schools even offer a sports room which is barely used other than days of special events, a physical trainer who barely visits school premises. Trying to become more modernised, children are made to use all electronic gadgets and technical programs at small age leaving them addicted to that electronic demons and resulting in eye problems. This way of living should change, children should be brought up near to environment and sports like in old times which helps in increasing their resistance power and allows them to withstand harmful viruses of present day.
In contrary, many techno schools just focus on academics and make children learn all future technolgy at small age and gaining great results. Their techniques of learning nearly benefitted students of every standard and greatly impressed parents, which in return making them to join their children in their e-techno schools and colleges. This may support some children who can cope with the pressure of acaemics, but many students suffer many psychological issues and left really stressed even led to many suicides. Even though these institutions gained importance by advertising their great success in academics and ruling present day education.
Hereby I conclude that, students should focus on learning technology in effective methods but should be provided with a regular break to energize them with new power, and break shoud necessarily included with physical education which makes them fit, steady and attentive by all means.
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The topic is taken from Cambridge book of IELTS 9 writing task 1 test 3 The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 56
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 65
- The graph below shows the information about languages 13 year old students in one school choose to study 73
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less knowledge'?
Suggestion: less knowledge
...cademics and results in poor grades and fewer knowledge of the curriculum. I believe including...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, really, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30193905817 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65338971432 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587257617729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6535929208 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.230769231 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15739380393 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622405489963 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453201050546 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986906446206 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422244458704 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.