Some people say the self employment is better than working for a company or distrubution while others disagree. Discuss both points of view . what is your opinion?
with the steady growth in the industralisation, the lifestyles of the people have been greatly affected. They have archived various milestones. Neverthless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that which job is better: self employment or working in a company? Through this essay I shall explore the dimensions of the topic through examples and observations and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people who believes that self employment is better than working in a company. They strengthen their view point by claiming that the individual person doing job have their own decision making power. They can make any decision own its own. Furthemore, they do not have to depend on others for any decision. Moreover, they can do work more efficiently. Secondly, the individual worker can earn more profit that the worker, working in a group. For instance, the survey is conducted by the workers of the telecom company that 60% people can earn more money being as an individual worker as compare to the group of workers. For instance, if a single person can do individual job they can take all the profits to yourself and on the other side, if they work for a group, then the profit will divided into all the group members.
Contrary to this, there is opposing group of peoples who believs that working in a company is better. To make thier arguments convincing, they claim that doing work in the team can
decreased the burden of work of single person. Moreover, doing work in the team can improve the knowlegde skills of the worker. Also communication skills nd confident of the worker increased. For example, a person working in a group have the opprtunity to gain differnt ideas regarding the work and they can do their much better. A famous writer Mattie Stepanek says that "Unity is strength, when there is teamwork and collaboration, wonderful things can be archived"
Nevertheless, weighing both the options, I believe that there is no single conclusion. Still, I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands.
- The charts below give infornation about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 30
- Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school Others think it is government s responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025. 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three differenet areas of crime in new port city centre from 2003-2012. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
with the steady growth in the industralisati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ore money being as an individual worker as compare to the group of workers. For in...
^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'divide'
Suggestion: divide
... work for a group, then the profit will divided into all the group members. Contrar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey claim that doing work in the team can decreased the burden of work of single p...
^^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ove the knowlegde skills of the worker. Also communication skills nd confident of th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., wonderful things can be archived' Nevertheless, weighing both the options,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74342590609 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3453990149 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211941242232 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696504331071 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674148089301 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116244805136 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385412836445 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.