Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
It is argued that we are paying too much attention and squandering resources in the conservation of wild animals and birds. Personally, I partly agree with the point of view.
There are many reasons why some aspects of protecting animals and birds haven’t been concerned much. In terms of habitat, because of the rapid population growth of humans, which leads to forest destruction for land demands. Consequently, more and more animals faced a lack of environment for surviving and reproducing. For instance, by constructing a wind power plant requires the expansive landmass, this affects animal habitat, especially many kinds of birds died by the turbine. Secondly, some people believe that animals could be a method of health treatment, giving rise to illegal hunting in many countries. For example, in Africa, rhino horns are exploited by hunters, then selling it to the wealthy for disease cures such as cancer.
On the other hand, people also spent too many resources on protecting animals. Many non-government organizations were established for conserving animals and accusing of actions that adverse to animals particularly, and the environment generally. For instance, the WSPA is an international non-profit animal welfare organization, which was born in 1981, aiming to encourage more people to support us transforming animal’s lives. Another reason is that the amount of money was prior invested in conserving endangered species instead of upgrading in infrastructures or improving living standards in some regions.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I still partly support that we are concentrating too much and greatly allocating on animal survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
- (19/09/2015) Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four differnt attractions in Brighton. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o spent too many resources on protecting animals. Many non-government organizatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52873563218 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1301110931 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9539251427 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276327113865 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101079335198 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942680034956 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179442968189 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673597673614 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.