Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Over the past few decades, many researchers have studies how much important paying attention and allocating resources is to protect animals and birds which are wild. Indeed, to my mind, there is now convincing evidence that the shield from danger of wild animals is reasonable to some extent.
To embark upon, There are a large amounts of animals and birds in wild world such as in the Amazon rainforest and Africa desert. Therefore, these animals lived during the history until now ,while to protect themselves against other animals. This means there is not negligible to government to spend too much money. As a result, the government can spend its budget on alleviating the poverty and other problems. For example, irrespective of water contamination, the government can make contribution to solve the global warming which threat the life of human kind in recant years. In my view, there are critical needs to satisfy. By the government.
On the other hand, it is clear that most animals and birds wild are on the verge of extinction. So, except the government, we human can firm campaigns to protect animals even if the government can not afford. In other words, it is necessary to attend to these kinds of animal adequately. This means that the government can divert resources to more urgent issues like medicines.
Taking everything into consideration, I would say that protecting wild animals and birds is important not as much as other problems. So it is better the government improve the people’s awareness of the habitat of flora and fauna. Hence, it has adequate money to solve significant problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The educational standards have declined in recent times particularly in the area of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the cause of this problem and odder some possible solution to it. 89
- Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 67
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
...nt. To embark upon, There are a large amounts of animals and birds in wild world such...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...imals lived during the history until now ,while to protect themselves against othe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06343283582 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77845301934 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6946681566 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230874481346 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674404356615 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727117903112 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144396813566 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461026805402 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.