Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Spending on conserving wild animals and birds is still a heated debate because of the huge amount of money needed. Personally, I totally disagree with this point of view.
There are two main reasons why we should draw attention to protecting wild animals. Firstly, the influence of climate changes on animals is more severe with different levels in countries and continents. Acid rain might cause the death of aquatic animals and destroy the environment of other animals, while the drought leads to wildfire in tropical forests and accelerates the extinction process in scarce animals and birds. Besides, haphazard hunting is affecting negatively the restoration of wildlife. For example, the forest fire in Australia in 2018 not only squander a lot of money but also sound the alarm for humans with the status of birds and wild animals.
Even though researches in the biology field have never been easy, I still believe that it will insure in terrible circumstances. First of all, when any birds extinct, researchers can use our resources and experience in the previous experiments to restore these pieces. DNA is derived from fossils of disappeared animals which might help scientists in the world to treat some potential diseases in humans and animals today. Not only the governments but some individual enterprises also participate in these researches by funding or providing appliances. If we use these sources properly and effectively, I must say that it will not be a wrong investment for the future.
In conclusion, wasting money or not depend on how we use it in particular situations. I completely agree with developing researches that relate to wild animals and birds due to our environment and diversity of biology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-15 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | duchuynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | TuronKuzibaev | 51 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | Rudraksha surve | 56 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 54
- Although more and more people read news on the internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 61
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1743772242 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84947843677 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5658196128 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167754885281 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521150990598 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397189648754 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101976943233 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192004790201 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.