Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wilds animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wilds animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Preservation for wild animal species is paid too much attention with abundant time and materials according to some people. From my point of view, it is quite necessary to concentrate on wild organisms too carefully. Furthermore, humans should decline their activities that are harmful to biodiversity and fix what people have done to nature.
At the beginning, investing a lot on natural creatures is not quite a excellent idea to shelter nature. In fact nowadays, despite effortness in conserving the environment, it seems to happen less seriously than in the past. Some forests and also water resources like rivers are recovered and are fresher respectively which have been popular in several years. For example, citizens have a tendency to care and worry be aware of the magnitude of pollution to keep the surrounding clean. Biodiversity still have been well-preserved in several years like the appearance of blue whales in Vietnam where giants marine animals rarely come because of lacking of fish for them.
On the other hand, despite having a numerous of significant enhancement in sheltering biodiversity and climate, nature still has an alarm status for human beings about our degradation activities. Specifically, some typical instance, such as forest fires are too much intense that it can follow in outer space leading to be endanger of several creatures, or a summer with highest temperature ever recorded in few decades in Europe and some nations in eastern Asia, it leads to deaths for various of vulnerable pedestrians and also disappointment for them, especially water shortage that it is not sufficient for cultivating.
In conclusion, although a lot of time and finance invested for conservation flora and fauna, it still makes quite a great progress in protecting a various of organism. However, it is not adequate treatment for Mother Nature in a long-term project in resetting the Earth

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-22 kim28101990 84 view
Essays by user kim28101990 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a lot on natural creatures is not quite a excellent idea to shelter nature. In fa...
^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...anger of several creatures, or a summer with highest temperature ever recorded in few decade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
...n flora and fauna, it still makes quite a great progress in protecting a various of organism. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25163398693 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9898746211 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.908117189 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13602731969 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481287102623 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595830547648 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892934510665 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749757462346 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.