Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people thought that investing more budget on constructing railways than ways. From my point of view, both of these moving types are significant so it should be taken care relevantly.
On the one hand, moving in road is the most fundamental transport ways and it attached to pedestrian's mind in once upon a time. Its benefits bring to human is excellent such as moving in road can be stop in every where, it does like a train when it can not stop immediately while having emergencies and it have to arrive in its stations. Besides, when roads have some technique issues, it can be tackle easier than train. However, moving in high ways or roads are endanger when traffic congestion and accidents can appear in every time. According to some surveys, accidents by transporting in roads are much more than all of the sum of accidents of other means of transport.
On the other hand, transporting in rail roads are one of the most essential means of transport when it contribute to humans being a lot. From the past, steam engine trains are the fastest vehicle, when transporting in roads by horse or some vehicle like bicycle was slower. Trains also are faster and the most popular means of transport to have ship way or some bullet trains and subway to carry passengers. It can make citizens feel more convenient and cozier while moving in roads does not have. Furthermore, there is no traffic jams when moving in rail roads and trains are punctual, when passengers miss their first attempt, 5 to 10 minutes will have a new. For example, several East Asia countries like Japan and China was invented some trains can go with 400km/h that means inhabitants will have free time to do other thing instead of waiting in roads crowding with other vehicles.
In conclusion, each of ways of transport has its own benefits and disadvantages. Thus, both of these ways should be invested equally to exploit all of potential of these two kinds.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-02 celine ayoub 67 view
2024-05-07 123456abcxyz 78 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 73 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 61 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 61 view
Essays by user kim28101990 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...t such as moving in road can be stop in every where, it does like a train when it can not s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...diately while having emergencies and it have to arrive in its stations. Besides, whe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endangered'.
Suggestion: endangered
...wever, moving in high ways or roads are endanger when traffic congestion and accidents c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ransporting in roads are much more than all of the sum of accidents of other means of tran...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
...st essential means of transport when it contribute to humans being a lot. From the past, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...irst attempt, 5 to 10 minutes will have a new. For example, several East Asia countri...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73372781065 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55630889586 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523668639053 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4330060213 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973645400812 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388488380872 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025629488338 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619692788217 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021765021512 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.