Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both views, give your own opinion and include examples from your experience.
It is undisputed that advertisements are the form of mass communication as well as the source of getting informations. Presently,some people reckon that advertisements shown on television are lucrative for people in many ways. By contrast, others have conflicting views. Here i would like to account both views with my own perceptions.
There are manifold points to endorse the former view. First and foremost, watching advertisements enable people to become skillful buyers. To demonstrate, advertisement shown on TV renders information about the latest and elite products that are coming in the market with astonishing features and qualities. In addition, people would be informed about special offers, heavy discounts on products. What is more, some advertisements raise social awareness on the general issues related to health, environment, education and government's policies. Consequently,advertisements have phenomenal advantages as well as intensify the standard of shopping.
On the contrary, some people believe that advertisements have thorny sides too. As an evidence of this, people are becoming insane and extravagant in every part of shopping. To illustrate, advertisements display products by adding spice into the real story. It influences the people and amplifies the buying habits. Furthermore, it also raises the problem of rubbish and extreme consumerism.
To recapitulate, undeniably, advertisements have few negative outcomes. But, I still believe that adverts have immense benefits to uplift standard of shopping and social awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-12 | sheetal | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | binita karki | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
- Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both views, give your own opinion and include examples from your experience. 56
- The table shows the change in the percentage of people joining in seven different sports from 1999 to 2009. 84
- Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion It is undeniable fact that technologies have been developing day by day and it has changed the society and lifestyles of p 86
- The trend of online shopping is increasing significantly What effect does it have on the environment and society in general 95
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...ource of getting informations. Presently,some people reckon that advertisements shown...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...st, others have conflicting views. Here i would like to account both views with m...
^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , advertisements
...n and governments policies. Consequently,advertisements have phenomenal advantages as well as i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90308370044 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5735860942 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638766519824 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.513055459 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8235294118 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3529411765 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218391932097 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658682669179 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515182119334 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128961891078 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266891673221 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.