In this day and age, a majority of people believe that producing
paper newspapers is not essential. I partially agree with this
view that access to the Internet is not widely available all over
the world.
On the one hand, most people are not interested in reading on
electronic devices, especially the old generation. First of all, the
elderly don't like looking at the telephone screens for a long
time, because they can headaches and lose memory. Instead,
they use newspapers and magazines to receive sources of new
information. In addition, severe myopia is not allowed to contact
with the radiation of blue light from the screen for too long time
because it’s harmful to the eyes as well as easy to be visual
impairment. To remedy that situation, they prioritize reading
books and newspapers to reduce eye habitation and practice
perseverance. For example, a girl - Mafia, watched cartoons on
her phone too much in a day, which cause her to lose one eye
and have to be treated in the hospital from May to nowadays.
On the other hand, paper-based articles take a long time to edit
and publish, so updating the new information on social media is
the best way to provide the exact and fastly information for
everyone. Moreover, people only spend a few minutes accessing
the Internet to receive up-to-the-minute information instead of
obtaining current news in newspapers. For instance, when Covid
- 19 broke out, the information about the occurrence and its
consequence on almost social networking such as TV and the
Internet.
In conclusion, both views have different strengths and
weaknesses points, but I completely agree with bringing up-to-
date on social media thanks to updating quickly and saving
nature materials.
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- In the presented chart information is shown on the quantity of paid and unpaid workers in 4 areas of sports of an Australian town in 2015 78
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages 67
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... widely available all over the world. On the one hand, most people are not int...
^^^
Line 16, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice perseverance. For example, a girl - Mafia, watched cartoons on her phone to...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the hospital from May to nowadays. On the other hand, paper-based articles ...
^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tworking such as TV and the Internet. In conclusion, both views have different...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8669681105 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2315347568 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 27.0 4.38176352705 616% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779094463184 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326958256025 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037079452048 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0199827800568 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380685421477 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.