Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behavior while others say the amount of time children spend watching Tv influences their behavior.
There is an argument on both sides of the question of children watching TV. While some people hold that children are most affected by what they watch on TV, the opponents rather put the blame on the amount of time to be the major factor influencing kids. In my perspective, I opine that both these two opinions have their own reasons to be based on.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the contents children are exposed to can play a pivotal role in orienting their doings. In such an age of ever-growing infotechnology, children have unlimited access to the wealth of information which varies from education to entertainment. This offers them a chance to enrich their knowledge through helpful educational programs, but might, at the same time, intimate improper behaviors in youngsters by watching unsuitable content involving drug abuse or severe violence. Content like these can easily have a strong impact first on children’s mindset, then their actions as they are still impressionable and unaware of those wrong doings. As a matter of fact, many reports have shown that there are cases of children who have been caught in the act of carrying out violence just to imitate their favorite characters in movies. Besides, other sources of information which also divert kids’ doings are commercial advertisements such as junk food. They intrigue youngsters’ interest by showing tempting images of their products, which then urges children to pester parents to buy no matter what it is harmful or not.
However, content is not the only factor attributed to a child’s behaviors. Another one is the amount of time children spend watching TV. If they watch TV during a sensible period, they can reap enormous benefits from getting into that activity. Otherwise, too much time watching television might result in several unwanted outcomes. Firstly, children riveting on the screen for hours after hours are more likely to become addicted to the TV. This then might gradually isolate children themselves from the outside world and erode their fundamental social skills such as communicating. Furthermore, constantly watching TV may push a child into a sedentary lifestyle. As a consequence, youngsters might avoid participating in outdoor activities, which are supposed to boost their well-being, just to sit in front of a TV watching.
In conclusion, I concur that both improper content and the amount of time watching TV can have an influence on the young. In order to prevent adverse impacts, children should be more controlled when watching television.
- Many businesses think that the new employees who have just graduated from schools lack interpersonal skills such as working with colleagues as a team What has caused this and what are the solutions to this problem 78
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The consumption of the world s resources is increasing at a dangerous rate What are the causes and solutions 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17745803357 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86187496458 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580335731415 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2277062485 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.95 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419229262124 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121488903445 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09514793302 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264437572146 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575323670815 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17745803357 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86187496458 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580335731415 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2277062485 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.95 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419229262124 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121488903445 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09514793302 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264437572146 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575323670815 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.