Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
In the digital era, it is irrefutable that technology has substantially affected the way people store personal data. The use of information storage in the Internet seems to have considerably become more prevalent among users over the past few years. While this has several advantages, I believe that it is an overall negative trend.
To begin with; there are several benefits of utilizing this kind of information storage. First and foremost, such method can save a lot of time for individuals. Repetitive entering to person-related data can be avoided only by a jew clicks. For example, if a consumer wants to pay for the food at a restaurant or to pay the bill in the supermarket, one storage of his/her identity makes the procedure faster and more convenient. Secondly, access to personal data everywhere is indisputably one of the biggest merits of this trend. By logging in the banking account or using cookies in the phone, the identity of users can be obtained immediately without making an attempt to remember complicated details.
On the flip side, I am of the opinion that aforementioned upsides came at the expense of greater downsides. Firstly, it is greatly concerned that sensitive information uploaded in the Internet can forster widespread fraud. These days, there are a number of hackers who break into a person's or an organization's secure spaces online and then do fraudulent activities such as transferring money to another account or making illegal transactions under the name of a particular individual. Moreover, privacy is also a controversial issue. When saving personal records online it may run the risks of being compromised as Internet does not fully guarantee the security of the information. For example, that personally identifiable information including social media activities of 87 million Facebook users was compromised in September 2018 reflects upon the vulnerability of large companies and Internet services in controlling and preventing the misuse of customer’s data.
In conclusion, storing private data of users online is a common practice and brings about a lot of advantages, however, they are dwarfed by substantial disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | nbaochi14 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-29 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | TiaraNGuyen@99 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | immtee | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | Le Bich Diep | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... are a number of hackers who break into a persons or an organizations secure spaces onlin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an organization' or simply 'organizations'?
Suggestion: an organization; organizations
... of hackers who break into a persons or an organizations secure spaces online and then do fraudu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32463768116 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16165856096 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4688636087 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189922230765 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526547313356 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413947144382 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112018347945 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313676006847 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.