Nowadays, more and more educators focus on the history's subject, because it can help the thinking of youngster become more mature than before. Some people think learning history is not a good method for teaching children's behavior, yet I disagree this opinion because of the past event are the best course material in education. In this essay, I will discuss other ways of education in teaching young fellows' behavior, and conclude with my personal opinions.
Firstly, Many educational experts think if juveniles did not learn the past events and knowledge, they might become an ignorant person. Moreover, when youngsters face different cultural shocks, they will know how to respect every ethnicity and culture. Therefore, most specialists believe the government should improve the historical knowledge of young people. A good idea would be to guide students to understand the authentic history by themselves, such as conducting historical drama and visiting the memorial museum. Through this process, they can deeply understand different the importance of past events.
Another method of using the past to teach juveniles behavior is the government should hold many activities of history for communities. These activities can not only help youngsters enhance their knowledge but also improve some parent information. Furthermore, such process can also prevent folks from causing discrimination's problems. Take an example, most Taiwanese do not know the black people's history, so they sometimes make some mistakes of racial discrimination. Thus, I think causing these phenomena is the lack of historical education.
To conclude, I strongly believe learning historical events or information can discipline children's behavior and widen their horizons since understanding this knowledge can remind people not to make the same problems. Ultimately, I agree learning history is the most efficient way for improving young fellows' attitude and making them ripen.
- Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve the quality of people s lives so that government money should be spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 62
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- To some people studying the past is the best to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 90
- Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fellows'' or 'fellow's'?
Suggestion: fellows'; fellow's
...her ways of education in teaching young fellows behavior, and conclude with my personal...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...e, most Taiwanese do not know the black peoples history, so they sometimes make some mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fellows'' or 'fellow's'?
Suggestion: fellows'; fellow's
... most efficient way for improving young fellows attitude and making them ripen.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64864864865 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86106166475 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60472972973 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8375346374 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119321476397 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388136158375 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335221042321 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760186444685 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262897417074 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.