Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

These days, adverting industry has progressed at a fast-paced around the world and we are too familiar with the attendance of big star names such as Lionel Messi or Christian Ronaldo and so on. However, the thing that amazes us the most is that recent advertisements have the participant from young children and there are lot of arguments about should it be prohibited. For me, I totally disagree with this argument.
For the majority, people will argue that without the contributions of the young generation including the children in the commercial advertisement will lead to the degradation of productivity in selling goods, so these company finances will be lost with an exponential amount. That is a really truth when we talk about advertised fields because most of the well-known brand’s name of junk food, toddler’s toy and educational stuffs are easy to access invariably for children. Most of these company’s customers are the young generation, with the largest proportion made up in these company’s consumers. Therefore, without these business strategies, companies can not peak its profit highly in these present world.
Secondly, for the opponent to this statement, they highly recommend that this action can improve children’s consciousness about the advantages of the products. Naturally, there is invariably something that is so called “good and bad” because not all everything that the commercial advertisement aimed at is good such as junk food, tobacco, smoking and alcohol. However, we can not always take it for granted, there are still some good advertised contents targeted to the green environment, health nutrient and educational infrastructures. For example, milk product commercial advertised in an avocado farm with children drinking milk, cows and green fields, these things are so lovely beautiful. So that children are likely to love drinking milk more and concerning about their growing body nutrient.
In conclusion, though there are a lot of arguments about the popularity of children advertising commercials. I do believe that this is an open world, everyone had chances to create a good environment for their children. For my opinion, advertisement purposed to children can bring about good effects for both these companies and those children. So that there should not be any restriction for this action.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-06-11 tata 56 view
2024-06-11 tata 56 view
2024-06-11 tata 56 view
2024-06-11 tata 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('really') instead an adjective, or a noun ('truth') instead of another adjective.
...ost with an exponential amount. That is a really truth when we talk about advertised fields be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 483, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...access invariably for children. Most of these company’s customers are the young generation, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
... with the largest proportion made up in these company’s consumers. Therefore, without these b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning about their growing body nutrient. In conclusion, though there are a lot of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not be any restriction for this action.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39024390244 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01571104603 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550135501355 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7041389583 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169332475597 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611722878773 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361749889778 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111210421494 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276048534631 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.