Advertising is gaining more popularity in the marketing of goods and services, but it is argued that advertisers should be prohibited to target children. I wholeheartedly concur with this idea for two main reasons that will be elaborated below.
This prohibition can bring meagre-income families many benefits. In fact, children are easily tricked and influenced by glossy photos, branding endorsements, or other advertising strategies of entrepreneurs, they may, in turn, force their parents to purchase unnecessary and unaffordable items, leading to financial burdens on them. For example, many Vietnamese children always ask their parents to buy excessive amounts of snacks and soft drinks, which have pictures of Elsa, Anna, or Captian America- famous characters in popular movies, thus exacerbating the economic well-being of households. Therefore, if advertisements do not direct at young kids, families could spend more money on other key fields, like education and healthcare, to improve their living standards.
Restrictions on advertising targeting youngsters could prevent their physical and mental illnesses. Specifically, many children are obsessed with unrealistic contents of advertisements, and they may be under the illusion that they can climb the wall, like Spider Man after using energy drink or they can break cements at ease after drinking soy milk. More seriously, some even give these challenges a try after using advertised products, leading to children’s frustration and physical injuries. Hence, to avoid unfortunate incidents, it is imperative to prohibit products aiming at children.
In conclusion, the constraints on advertising directing at kids bring a multitude of manifest advantages in terms of finance and health. The government should impose stringent punishments on trespassers to ensure the public’s interest.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: khanhkhanhlhp
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84191176471 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19505177747 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4654718331 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207235681095 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726660709327 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489617173464 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122215436532 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031053153896 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.