Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The modern society is divided on the issue of whether youngsters should be compelled to be involved in voluntary community-based enhancement tasks. While many believe in their considerable merits, I strongly support the idea that individuals also run some risks participating in these activities.
On the one hand, doing unsalaried work presents teenagers as well as the society with several favorable effects. Firstly, young adults carrying out these duties can build on a firm foundation for their future career. To clarify, the process of completing missions and interacting with different groups of people provides involving members first-hand experience in disparate fields along with the manipulation of soft skills. For example, via helping the disabled, volunteers can acquire some medical knowledge and caretaker skills, assisting them in preparing for nursing jobs. Secondly, volunteering foreshadows well-connected communities. Not only do those activities contribute to improving community's life but it also spreads sympathy among the population. Distance and gap, accordingly, are filled, which means residents’ intimacy.
On the other hand, should this idea be put into practice, the following demerits need considering. Mental problems are regarded as the foremost disadvantages. Due to the compulsion of unpaid community service, a number of youngsters would run into unwillingness to cooperate. Therefore, when coming up against difficulties, they have no intention of sharing to others, predisposing them of stress and even depression. Additionally, forcing juveniles into working for no money in leisure time irrespective of family conditions is impractical. This is the case of adolescents whose families are not wealthy or privileged. Obviously, instead of indulging themselves with unsalaried grind, those children had better spend time supporting family finance or taking part-time jobs to help their own parents.
In sum, the point of all teenagers being obligated to take part in local volunteer projects seems both beneficial and adverse. However, it is advisable that these schemes should be adapted after adolescents’ status being agonized over.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | oxfordpro111 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | oxfordpro111 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Allen_1237 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | oxfordpro125 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | Amy Thuy Trang | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85579937304 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21317990669 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.711598746082 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7333480565 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224140348817 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535563652585 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446213242511 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121967142925 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175275602874 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.