Government and society have long sought ways in which to improve educational quality. While some people believe that students should be able to select various optional subjects others think that they should study only several science-related subjects. As well as offering my personal opinion, this essay will discuss both of these views and show why the limited choice of study disciplines is not an effective measure of education.
Nowadays, great attention is paid to science, education and high technologies. So, the demand for new professions and specializations in various science fields is growing every year. The main reason is that these kinds of subjects contribute visibly to society. For example, improvements in robotics rely on advances in mathematical research, engineering and IT. Only allowing students to study these kinds of subjects will mean that there will be more people available for work in these areas.
On the other hand, those who support the opinion that students should be able to choose their favorite area of study have their own reasons as well. Society is not able to predict the future and what kind of abilities or skills that people will need. Nowadays, many HR departments pay more attention to soft-skills like leadership and team creativity, and this trend continues to rise. If students are only trained to be good scientists or engineers, they may not be able to succeed in these fields. Clearly, strict control over education and reducing the number of disciplines are not the best way to improve teaching.
In conclusion, while it may seem reasonable to teach students science-related subjects that are currently viewed as useful, I believe that allowing students to choose what they want will help society be better prepared for whatever changes the future will bring.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 93
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that that should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 82
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n which to improve educational quality. While some people believe that students shoul...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...elated subjects. As well as offering my personal opinion, this essay will discuss both of these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e not the best way to improve teaching. In conclusion, while it may seem reasona...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24315068493 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77493641298 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578767123288 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5566257535 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38928756617 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113456585657 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143697507574 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238269319367 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672470394624 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.