Controversy over the idea of whether undergraduates should be allowed to follow their own will or it should be something mandatory for these to pursue subjects pertain to sciences and technology.
On the one hand, there is no surprise at the reason why many assume that strive for required subjects like technology and science is pragmatic for college students. Companies have to catch the wave if they want to survive, as the result of the evolution of industrialization 4.0. Therefore, career opportunities such as programmers, scientists, or engineers will be open than ever, with promotion prospects and competitive salary packages. For example, regarding research of the labor market in Vietnam in 2020, fresher graduates with major in Information Communication Technology have no problem when seeking jobs, and the payroll was expected to be highest, compared with students from other majors. Furthermore, the two fields have been envisioned to be unceasing. By virture of such, studying these professionally may guarantee the future of an individual in an enduringly developing world.
On the other hand, individuals, despite their ages should not be seized freedom rights, including the right to pursue ambitions. The same applies to undergraduates. They cannot be limit in approaching their favorite subjects. Evidence demonstrates that if someone is obliged to undertake something they are not passionate about, it can lead to abasement and animosity for them. However, on a contrary scenario, a college student who has a comprehensive course of the law can become a lawyer, a judge, or a counselor in the forthcoming. Consequently, he can execute justice and integrity to the civilians and the society, contributing to developing the world in a moral aspect.
In sum, I take on the viewpoint that all students should be allowed to choose what they want to learn without restrictions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20006249869 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9475084556 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312227177747 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915570462796 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073528345745 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194409963696 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485911915728 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.