The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the disparity in annual expenditure in a specific school in three years including 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Generally, school spent much of the funding to pay teachers' salaries whereas the cost of insurance only took into account a small fraction.
In particular, in 1981, money using to pay salary for the teachers is 40%. That percentage rose into a half of the total annual spending in 1991, and by 2001, it accounted for only 45%. Although the amount of money spent on the cost of insurance was the least, this percentage rose each decade. By 2001, the proportion of expenditure on insurance was 8%. The percentage of expenditure on other workers' salaries, on the other hand, decreased by every ten years, from 28% in 1981, and 22% in the precedent ten years to 15% in 2001. The amount of money spent on resources as well as furniture and equipment changed depending on the requirement of the decades. In 1981, the two categories accounted for the same proportion of expenditure while in the percentage of money spent on resources was higher and lower than the other in 1991 and 2001 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, while, in particular, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81443298969 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73287282899 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7730848041 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247983403186 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108330011879 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114293795854 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198431500666 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153309934149 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.