Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Controversy over the idea whether undergraduate should be allowed to follow their own will or it should be something mandatory for these to pursue subjects pertain to sciences and technology.
On the one hand, there is no surprise at the reason why many assume that strive for required subjects like technology and science is pragmatic for college students. Companies have to catch the wave if they want to survive, as the result of the evolution of industrialization 4.0. Therefore, career opportunities such as programmer, scientists or engineer will be open than ever, with promotion prospects and competitive salary packages. For instance, regarding a research of the labour market in Vietnam in 2020, fresher graduates with major in Information Communication Technology have no problem when seeking jobs, and the payroll was expected to be highest, compared with students from other majors. Furthermore, the two fields have been envisioned to be unceasing, so studying these professionally may guarantee future of an individual in an enduringly developing world.
On the other hand, individual despite ages should not be seized freedom rights, including right to pursue ambitions as well as undergraduate cannot be limit in approaching their favorable subjects. Evidence demonstrates that if someone is obliged to undertake something they not passionate about, it can lead to abasement and animosity for them. However, on a contrary scenario, a college student who has a comprehensive course of the law can become a lawyer, a judge, or a counselor in the forthcoming. Consequently, he or she can execute justice and integrity to the civilians and the society, which contribute to develop the world in a moral aspect.
In sum, I take on the viewpoint that all students should be allowed to choose what they want to learn without restrictions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...alary packages. For instance, regarding a research of the labour market in Vietnam in 2020...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31399317406 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15512351039 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634812286689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9344223359 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.7 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297997489514 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101644649439 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769958265235 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188205654365 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557090189383 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.