Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time

It is convinced that art plays an essential role in human spiritual life. Therefore, some people consider art as an indispensable subject for children at school. However, a group of people claims that art is such a time-waster. Personally, I suppose that children should be exposed to the beauty of art at school for their imaginary development.
On the one hand, there are some reasons for art to become a waste of time in many people's opinion. Firstly, they might believe that art is often abstracts and difficult to demonstrate and understand. Therefore, children with limited knowledge and experience may spend a large amount of their short school time feeling bored and uninterested. Secondly, people think that working in the art profession can push their children at risk because of the rigorousness of this field. For instance, a Vietnamese artist needs more than 10 years practising drawing or carving although their products might not be recognized by the public and they can be unemployed anytime.
In others' opinion, art is an important needed subject for children to develop creativity. That said art taught at school for children such as kindergarten might never be as complicated as mentioned in the opinion above, but it is simple and motivative. Children can freely create and enjoy the beauty of their surroundings through drawing and painting. Besides, when looking at other's illustrations, children can easily practise and upgrade their imagination which is vital to solving problems for their work, for their life. Currently, there are lots of job opportunities for these children, not only artists but also content writers or creators with lucrative salaries.
In conclusion, some people are always sceptical about the importance of art to children. Nevertheless, I believe that children's imagination, as well as their future, will benefit if they are exposed precisely to art.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26644736842 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9298095831 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0267197115 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433116403103 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14914876283 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097308921899 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266181121807 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764954335048 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.