Many people argued that an increasing in the minimum age of eligibility for drivers will improve road safety. While this idea might help reduce the number of road accidents, I could maintain that imposing stricter punishments on traffic law violators.
On the one hand, this policy might diminish traffic accidents which boosts the safety of roads. To be more specific, as commuters get older, they are more mature and responsible when they join in a traffic, resulting in lessening traffic incidents. Moreover, this practice also deters youngsters who are immature and unaware of the repercussions of their actions from careless driving. In both of these cases, the number of road incidents which causes unsafety road is limited, generating a safer environment for other commuters.
However, an increase in older licensing ages can only solve a limited part of these complex road safety enhancement. In reality, many youngsters nowadays still join in traffic without a driving licence, which causes traffic incidents become worse. Therefore, the most effective solution would be enacting more severe punishments that prevents drivers from committing traffic-based infringements. For example, drivers who exceed the speed limit or drink alcohol while joining the traffic should have to pay a heavy monetary fine or have their drivers’ licence revoked. As a result, more drivers will obey the rules when they are in the traffic, contributing to improve the safety of roads.
In conclusion, while rising minimum of legal age of vehicle users can partly improve road safety by discouraging the young from commuting, the ideal solution would be introducing much harsher punishments on those who violate laws. In my opinion, governments must also act them urgently to alleviate the perennial problems of road accidents and other related-traffic issues.
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44791666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82586630099 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1761056554 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138193241791 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549498356539 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666983632303 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981162704051 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434878823358 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.