Many people argue that physical schools are no longer necessary as the internet enables children to have homeschooling due to its wealth-widely accessible information related to various subjects. While it is convenient for children to learn online at home, I could contend that conventional schools are still essential since they offer more comprehensive learning environments for students.
On the one hand, online learning may offer its learner a much more convenient learning environment. This is because the internet enables its learners to access easily to an enormous source of information related to their learning needs whenever and wherever they want. With an internet-connected laptop or smartphone, for example, online learners search easily for their learning materials anytime and wherever they desire. On the contrary, those attending traditional education have to find out their learning requirements through mainly textbooks or books in the library, which would be time-consuming and exhausting.
Despite the above mentioned, I maintain that schools are still indispensable foundation for education due to their more comprehensive teaching methodologies. Firstly, traditional schools are more reliable. To be more specific, schools offer a standardized curriculum scruitinized strictly in terms of its contents, types of lectures, appropriate textbooks by the headmaster before being used. This helps students protect themselves from misleading learning materials, which are frequently rife on the internet. Moreover, children receiving formal schooling are taught invaluable moral lessons such as politeness, honesty and respect for older people. Without schooling, conquently, children may not comprehensively develop both wisedom and morolity.
In conclusion, although the internet offers students its flexible learning environment, I believe that schools are still a great necessity due to their more effective teaching methodologies. In the future, I hope that learners will appreciate the value of proper schooling instead of focusing on the internet.
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 73
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 78
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 78
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01346801347 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22541700474 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1482312956 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136007514375 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050001775655 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413169094341 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958305075111 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404595843303 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.