Raising the minimum age for drivers is argued to enhance road safety most effectively. While this approach can potentially reduce the number of road accidents involving experienced and immature young drivers, I maintain that imposing stricter punishments for traffic violations and upgrading public transportation would be more feasible ways to address the root causes of these problems.
Undoubtedly, increasing the minimum age requirement for vehicle drivers can mitigate some crashes on the roads. In reality, young drivers who lack experience and maturity are more likely to engage in reckless and dangerous driving behaviors. This might put themselves and other commuters in danger. Thus, requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain a formal driver’s license can encourage them to operate their vehicles more responsibly and cautiously. As a result, this can create a safer and more secure driving environment for all road users. For instance, in some countries, such as Japan and South Korea, where the minimum age for drivers is higher, there are lower rates of traffic-based accidents involving youngsters.
Nevertheless, this measure does not fully address the underlying causes of road-related accidents. Furthermore, these issues can stem from various factors, including careless driving behaviors or poor transport infrastructure, not solely from young commuters. Thus, enforcing severe penalties for traffic offenses such as heavy fines or extended license suspensions for repeat offenders would serve as a deterrent against reckless drivers. Additionally, the government should invest in public transportation enhancements, such as providing more bus and train services, which can encourage drivers to less rely on private vehicles. Consequently, this ultimately leads to fewer accidents on the road. The Mass Rapid Transit system in Singapore, for example, has significantly reduced the number of personal cars on the roads by implementing stricter punishments for careless drivers, along with a well-established underground subway system.
In conclusion, although the higher minimum legal age for drivers can limit traffic accidents caused by drivers with both inexperience and immaturity to some extent, strict laws and punishments for careless commuters and upgrades to public transportation would be a more effective measure to solve the underlying causes of these issues. I am also convinced that once these solutions are implemented, there will be more people obeying these regulations, contributing to a safer and more secure environment for everyone.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 67
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77806788512 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11124406963 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579634464752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.230074291 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3125 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185820569545 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662329059907 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605155580203 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12017744422 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251673825573 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.