Population has been grow rapidly, leading more homes are needed. Sometimes the demand for accommodation increases slightly. Some people have enough finance to design their houses to last a long time whilst poor citizens just want to find somewhere to live. I believe that buildings should be designed carefully before using.
To begin with, many buildings were carefully designed by architects. Moreover, these also bring satisfactions for user because the buildings were made from good materials as well as impressive design from architects. People use it could pleasure with both of internal and external appearance of their house. Also, the building should be designed to last a long time because this can have high qualities. For this reason, host and builder invest more time and money in order to build the house carefully. As a result, people also use the building for a long time.
Nevertheless, some people prefer staying in a cheap house which has a fast process of construction. Obviously, cheap buildings are suitable for people who have low income. They do not think about how much they cost to build, just one thing they desire is that the building has low price and they can afford for this without the worry about debt. Additionally, cheap and quick accommodations will provide us a various options to choose for living. For example, in my country, lots of cheap buildings were built for worker and students. This means that they have more choices for where they want to live.
To sum up, I believe that having outstanding houses are like dreaming for people who have huge budget whereas, I think it is better accommodation for other people have limit salary package to live in an affordable flats or houses.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- According to an international travel magazine many tourists today fly straight to their holiday resort and almost never leave it Unlike tourist in the 1960s and 70s they return home with no experience of the local culture Why do you think this happen How 93
- Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to. How true is the statement? What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments? 61
- Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time Others believe that it is more important to provide accomodation quickly and cheaply Discuss both there views and give your own opinion Give reason for you 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
Population has been grow rapidly, leading more homes are needed....
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'option'?
Suggestion: option
...ccommodations will provide us a various options to choose for living. For example, in m...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'flat'?
Suggestion: flat
...salary package to live in an affordable flats or houses.
^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... live in an affordable flats or houses.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, for example, i think, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99307958478 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59457894398 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1295712443 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8823529412 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301373789898 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103218367081 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571996788558 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186942061522 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464803959313 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.