Some people think that children can learn efficiently by watching television. Therefore, children should be encourage to watch TV both at school and home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, many people approve that television content is an effective source for child’s development; therefore, children should spend time on watching television not only at home but also at school. From my point of view, I strongly disagree with that idea. In this essay, I will try to address reasons why watching television is not good for children and propose alternative better methods.
To begin with, televisions’ negative effects on children outweigh its positive. Nowadays, television content providers offer many channels with different kind of contents; however, most of them are about entertainment such as movies and television shows, which are not suitable for children. Furthermore, spending too much time on watching television affects negatively on both physical and mental aspects of children. For instance, concentrating on the screen for a long time will significantly weaken their eyes; besides that, children will be more passive and dependent because of the lack of outside activities.
On the other hand, there are other alternative learning forms which are better for children. Firstly, outdoor activities will help children develop their physical strength and enhance their awareness about surrounding subjects and events; therefore, children should spend time on playing outside with others rather than staying at home to watch television. Secondly, adults should spend time with their children going to places such as museums, zoos and gardens; hence, with real life engagement, children will be more interested and learn faster.
To conclude, I believe that watching television is not an efficient way for children to learn new things. Adults should encourage their children doing outdoor activities to enhance their awareness better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-05 | Guanxing Lan | 73 | view |
- To improve their appearances, many people spend money a lot of money on products like clothing, haircut, and beauty products. Some people think it is a good way to spend money; other people believe that there are better ways to spend money. Discuss both v 79
- We should encourage young people to visit different countries as it could bring many benefits to them Do you agree or disagree 86
- If people go to live in a new country, they should follow local customs and traditions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that people should not use mobiles phone in public places, but people think that people should be allowed to use cell phones anywhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- More people than ever before travel to other countries than ever before Why this has happened Is this a positive development or negative 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65799256506 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8322307348 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6537711742 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294055081964 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11827289768 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632209647514 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203369269704 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478221435729 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.