Some people think that children should be encouraged to compete, whereas others claim that competition is not good for children. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
One of the most debatable topics nowadays is whether children should be motivated to compete or not. While some people believe that this skill has to be developed from a young age, others argue that, on a contrary, it is beneficial to focus on co-operation. This essay disagrees with the approach that brings young people to a challenge of competing.
Promoting rivalry among offsprings is one of the strategies that adults pursue in upbringing. This tactics is helpful with certain soft skills, such as leadership and competitiveness, creating a solid foundation for a future job hunt. Despite this, some children can take it as a license to run amok, and this essay disagrees that even a healthy strive to conflict is acceptable. Poland is a prime example, where marks comparison was removed for the first grade students, to help deal with a previous experience of interruptive and impulsive behaviours in the class.
Another point of view is coming from those who feel that teaching a child to work together with the peers is a path to becoming someone who brings value to the world. Ability to co-operate helps to raise awareness of the social aspects, promotes respect and will to support others. It is therefore agreed that learning to put a collective effort early in life is beneficial for a person, so as for the community on a whole. For instance, in a 2020 social poll done in United Kingdom, all employees of Help UK Charity shared childhood memories, prioritising inclusion and assistance to their mates.
In conclusion, a feeling of competitiveness adopted at the early stages of life can serve as a paramount soft skill in future career domination, however, some still feel that it brings more harm than good and opt for a gentler approach, namely prioritising a sense of togetherness when dealing with tasks. Hence, even for the good purpose, the benefits of encouraging young people to rival are clearly negative.
- The maps show the Grange park as it is today and as it was a century earlier 89
- The reading passage and the lecturer discuss the reasons for a decline in the sea otter population The writer states that it is more likely that environmental pollution is the cause of the decline The lecturer disagrees with this point of view and claims 80
- Your university is located in a community with a struggling economy The school administration has decided to make it mandatory for each student to volunteer at least 40 hours per year to one of the town s many volunteer programs Do you agree or disagree w 76
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after shcool Discuss both views 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...egies that adults pursue in upbringing. This tactics is helpful with certain soft sk...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ults pursue in upbringing. This tactics is helpful with certain soft skills, such ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98765432099 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87239408284 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5603189357 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169590051346 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557551847014 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533156576886 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100969508518 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550373405427 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.